When I arrived in Taiwan a few months ago I got in trouble by remarking how little things had changed here since my last visit about 5 years ago. Locals here are sensitive about this slowdown in the pace of development. I suspect it is due to the massive flow of talent and capital to mainland China from Taiwan. (I could probably quantify the financial side of this by looking at FDI in China originating from Taiwan in the last 5-10 years and comparing it to Taiwan's GDP and domestic investment in the same period.) Ambitious businesspeople know that the biggest fortunes are to be made there, and Taiwanese companies (like Foxconn) have played an important role in China's economic miracle. But we've recently passed a tipping point -- Taiwanese in China now often feel like "small potatoes" and notice that mainlanders now possess a surfeit of money, ambition and even knowhow.
Some notes from conversation with my uncle.
Foxconn recently almost doubled wages for workers in China.
Foxconn recently added several hundred thousand workers, bringing its headcount to well over 1 million.
Foxconn will expand into the interior of China, where wages are lower. Vietnam and other low-wage competitors lack the necessary infrastructure to compete. [The infrastructure in China is really first rate. In some cases it is superior to what is found in the US or Taiwan!]
My uncle characterizes engineers educated in China as "smart" but poorly trained. He claims that after the difficult college entrance exams university students tend to take it easy, and that the current generation of faculty in China are unworthy of their students (many of these faculty were poorly educated due to the Cultural Revolution). [In my own experience with PRC physicists I would say things are improving.] He noted that recent graduates can be made into good engineers after a year or two of training, but that they lack practical knowledge at first. [I would guess US corporate engineers might say the same of our graduates!] He said something like "sure, they know thermodynamics and circuit theory, but they can't set up a process line..."
My uncle is worried about prospects for the US -- he sees the technology gap between China and the US as almost closed and wonders how America can compete against Chinese workers making much lower wages. He didn't deny that the US is still more innovative, but noted that the gains from this innovation (i.e., jobs and commercial industries) are now captured by those with manufacturing capability. In other words, a key bit of innovation might make a few people (e.g., at a startup) rich, but down the line someone has to actually manufacture and ship products, which creates jobs and wealth at a much larger scale. He is certain that will be done in China. I tried to point out that this is counter to the conventional US mythology (Apple gets the big margins, Foxconn's profit is pennies per iThingy shipped), but he just said "It's a matter of time."
My uncle is confident that the PRC government can control inflation and other social problems in the near term. He characterizes the leadership as corrupt but effective. He also noted that younger Chinese are not willing to work as hard or suffer as much as their parents did. Foxconn had to deal with this by changing overtime policies -- the previous generation of workers would take all the overtime they could get, whereas the younger generation balks at too much.
Coincidentally, another aunt and uncle passed through town yesterday, from Los Angeles, on their way to Shanghai to buy an apartment. Real estate costs in Shanghai and Taipei are ridiculous -- many new apartments (roughly 100 square meters) cost over $1M US! My Foxconn uncle characterizes this as a bubble and notes that many workers have become "slaves to their apartments".
Related: NYTimes economics reporter David Leonhardt on the growing consumer economy in China. Slide show.
4 comments:
Interesting insights. I cannot understand however, why your uncle can't see the obvious. As economic growth continues the chinese standard of life will increase. Wages will only stay much lower for so long. It's already happening as some of his observations show.
The direction of change is obvious to everyone, but how long will it take? There are still hundreds of millions of underemployed people in the less developed interior of the country. It may be decades or more before the whole country is developed and wages are uniformly high.
That's good that Lee Kuan Yew knows. Can he also tell me who will win the world cup 2050?
I did not argue about world leadership, whatever that may mean (the economy is not a zero-sum game after all), just about rising income levels and their effects on competitiveness.
Also, a lot of people in that thread seem to focus solely on manufacturing. It is understandable that people IN manufacturing have that view (like the uncle and Andy Grove). But manufacturing is becoming less important for the overall economy [1] just as agriculture did about 100 years ago.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_economy
Post a Comment