Friday, February 15, 2013

The uses of gloom



Omri Tal writes on the history of The Gloomy Prospect. Apparently, the term originally referred to non-shared environmental effects (see Random microworlds), before Turkheimer applied it to genetic causation.

Personally, I'm an optimist -- I believe in Pessimism of the Intellect but Optimism of the Will  :-)

Hi Steve,

Just to point out with regard to your recent interesting post.

1. The Gloomy Prospect is a term originally by Plomin and Daniels (1987). As Turkheimer (2000) notes:

Plomin and Daniels (1987) almost identified the answer to this question, but dismissed it as too pessimistic:

"One gloomy prospect is that the salient environment might be unsystematic, idiosyncratic, or serendipitous events such as accidents, illnesses, or other traumas . . . Such capricious events, however, are likely to prove a dead end for research. More interesting heuristically are possible systematic sources of differences between families. (p. 8)"

The gloomy prospect is true. Nonshared environmental variability predominates not because of the systematic effects of environmental events that are not shared among siblings, but rather because of the unsystematic effects of all environmental events…
-- But indeed, it is Turkheimer's paper that has made the term famous.

2. The Gloomy Prospect is predominately about the unsystematic 'nonshared environment', rather than about missing heritability. In the section you quote, he extends this notion to include unknown genetic factors, but it's not the "classic" use ;)

Two interesting papers by Omri, at his web page:

Tal O, 2013. Two Complementary Perspectives on Inter-Individual Genetic Distance. BioSystems. Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages 18–36

Tal O, 2012. Towards an Information-Theoretic Approach to Population Structure. Proceedings of Turing-100: The Alan Turing Centenary. p353-369

2 comments:

ben_g said...

Steve, how optimistic or pessimistic are you that there will be low hanging fruit with which to increase intelligence once we know which genes are involved? For example, that certain diets or low-side effect drugs will be available to rise your IQ a significant amount?

I'm totally unequipped to speak on it, but when I looked up the recently IQ-associated gene (http://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=FNBP1L) the related "drugs and compounds" includes Phosphatidylserine, which naturally occurs in food and has been found to possibly help with ADHD. Gave me hope that there may be some low hanging fruit?

steve hsu said...

I am unqualified to answer your question. But at the 10% probability level I wouldn't be surprised if we someday found a cognition enhancing drug.

Blog Archive

Labels