The audio is also available via iTunes as a podcast, and includes some Q&A at the end which challenges some of Jacques' assumptions. The Q&A is not included in the video below.
Synopsis:
For over two hundred years we have lived in a western-made world, one where the very notion of being modern was synonymous with being western. The book argues that the twenty-first century will be different: with the rise of increasingly powerful non-Western countries, the west will no longer be dominant and there will be many ways of being modern. In this new era of ‘contested modernity’ the central player will be China.
Martin Jacques argues that far from becoming a western-style society, China will remain highly distinctive. It is already having a far-reaching and much-discussed economic impact, but its political and cultural influence, which has hitherto been greatly neglected, will be at least as significant. Continental in size and mentality, and accounting for one fifth of humanity, China is not even a conventional nation-state but a ‘civilization-state’ whose imperatives, priorities and values are quite different. As it rapidly reassumes its traditional place at the centre of East Asia, the old tributary system will resurface in a modern form, contemporary ideas of racial hierarchy will be redrawn and China’s ages-old sense of superiority will reassert itself. China’s rise signals the end of the global dominance of the west and the emergence of a world which it will come to shape in a host of different ways and which will become increasingly disconcerting and unfamiliar to those who live in the west.
See also Is there a China model?, which discusses the concept of performance legitimacy (a modern analog of the Mandate of Heaven?) as opposed to democracy.
More: Worst case scenarios and governance in China, and links here.
2 comments:
1. Once again Steve shows simultaneously his ethnocentrism and shame at being Chinese.
2. "Posterior probabilities should not equal prior probabilities after a nontrivial encounter with data -- if they do that is a clear warning sign"
Scientism is one of Steve's vices. As Heidgeer has said, "Science doesn't think."
3. China is not a multiethnic country in the way the US or France is, and Japan and Korea are even less so.
The West would be in the ascendancy forever were it not for immigration.
Political correctness is a big problem in the West. The problem is that blank-slate liberals make it impossible for people to contemplate anything unpleasant or address bad policies like affirmative action in an intelligent way.
I suppose religious fundamentalism is also a big problem in America.
Post a Comment