In an earlier post I discussed the advantages of attending an elite university. A related question is: what fraction of the total population of top students in the US attend an elite university? The answer is a function of where we put the lower cutoff for top students.
One interesting population to consider is the subset of National Merit Semi-Finalists who are awarded scholarships directly funded by the National Merit Corporation. Semi-Finalists are themselves the top percent of PSAT/SAT takers, so this subset is an especially elite group. From my experience I would guess that only the top 10-20 percent (see *** below) of National Merit Semi-Finalists are offered these portable awards, as opposed to other "National Merit Scholarships" that are funded by individual colleges. (Almost all non-elite colleges use these self-funded NMS to increase the enrollment of talented students; any Semi-Finalist is eligible for such an award. The most elite universities do not need to offer self-funded scholarships of this type, as discussed below.)
About 2300 NMS scholarships funded by the corporation are awarded each year. It turns out that just 10 elite universities account for well over half of these awardees. The vast majority of universities in the US have zero students from this select population! Data from this report. (Thanks to a reader of the blog for sending it to me.)
Number of NMS in entering class / size of entering class.
Caltech 42 / 200
Harvard 266 / 1600
Yale 234 / 1300
Princeton 196 / 1300
Stanford 110 / 1600
MIT 110 / 1000
Brown 91 / 1500
Duke 105 / 1600
Penn 125 / 2000
Berkeley 91 / 6000
Total 1270
Note, large numbers of Semi-Finalists who are not in this top group (i.e., not among the top 10-20 percent or so) do not receive a National Merit Scholarship because they choose to attend an elite university that does not self-fund additional awards. Just by looking at average SAT scores one would guess that over half the students at some of the schools listed above were Semi-Finalists. Apparently, the marginal value to these schools of "just another Semi-Finalist" does not warrant the expenditure of a few thousand dollars in additional scholarship funds. ("If we wanted to, we could fill our entire freshman class with Semi-Finalists!" etc. etc.)
*** If Semi-Finalists are in the top .5 percent of the population (assuming some selection in PSAT takers relative to the general population), the threshold IQ is +2.5 SD (137 or so). The NMS population discussed above is perhaps another SD higher (IQ 150 or so). You can directly estimate the number of students at the Semi-Finalist level: if 4M students graduate from HS each year in the US, that means about 20K above the 99.5th percentile. If the 2.3K NMS are the elite of this population, they would constitute the top 12 percent or so.
- Steve Hsu
- Professor of physics at the University of Oregon. Homepage. Archive. Favorite posts. Twitter: @hsu_steve
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Elite universities and human capital mongering
Labels:
brainpower,
elitism,
higher education,
human capital,
iq,
psychometrics
blog comments powered by Disqus
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
►
2012
(44)
-
►
02
(20)
- Class, brains and income
- Test preparation and SAT scores
- Turing and wavefunction collapse
- Daily Show catches linsanity
- Beyond Race in Affirmative Action
- Linsanity on SNL
- Luke and Maddie revisited
- Intergenerational mobility: Bowles and Gintis and ...
- Solvay 1961
- Greg Clark: Are there ruling classes?
- History is impossible
- Jeremy Lin in historical perspective
- Class and Race
- UC Davis colloquium
- Wharton MBA compensation by industry
- Trouble ahead
- Paper Promises: Money, Debt and the new World Orde...
- Jeremy Lin represents
- Personnel Selection: horsepower matters
- Transparency in college admissions
-
►
01
(14)
- Some recommended reading
- Looking back
- Dismantling Detroit
- The Moral Foundation of Economic Behavior
- US manufacturing jobs
- Gracie Breakdown: heel hook edition
- How did East Asians become "yellow"?
- Lana Del Rey
- Inside Duke: hurting the ones we love?
- James Crow colloquium
- "Phantom" heritability
- Eric Lander profile
- Mathematical minds
- Genomic prediction
-
►
02
(20)
-
▼
2010
(234)
-
▼
10
(25)
- Go Ducks
- Group effectiveness and intelligence
- Maxwell's Demon and genetic engineering
- Acts of creation
- Yellow Peril: 2010 and 1920
- Can I play, too?
- g, math ability and their population distribution
- News from the future
- Dwelling in Dameisha
- BGI photos
- Wen Jiabao, Adam Smith and Marcus Aurelius
- Wigner recollections
- BGI visit
- Les Grandes Ecoles Chinoises
- Elite universities and human capital mongering
- Taipei photos 5: National Day
- Taipei photos 4
- Luis Alvarez quotes
- Some data on regression
- How the world works
- Ferguson, Summers and the Inside Job
- No singularity here, move along please
- Taiwan photos 3
- The hard truth about the French Foreign Legion
- On living like kings
-
▼
10
(25)
Labels
- physics (215)
- finance (214)
- globalization (197)
- brainpower (126)
- credit crisis (110)
- genetics (108)
- photos (94)
- China (92)
- economics (88)
- travel (79)
- credit crunch (77)
- psychometrics (76)
- technology (74)
- science (72)
- american society (64)
- iq (63)
- gilded age (57)
- human capital (53)
- startups (53)
- books (47)
- careers (46)
- elitism (46)
- psychology (46)
- cdo (45)
- income inequality (45)
- universities (43)
- higher education (42)
- derivatives (39)
- innovation (36)
- mortgages (36)
- autobiographical (35)
- ai (34)
- evolution (33)
- bubbles (32)
- biology (31)
- genius (30)
- kids (30)
- behavioral economics (29)
- social science (29)
- quantum mechanics (28)
- talks (28)
- caltech (27)
- mma (27)
- hedge funds (26)
- education (25)
- subprime (25)
- bgi (23)
- housing (23)
- taiwan (23)
- foo camp (21)
- expert prediction (20)
- many worlds (20)
- sports (20)
- ultimate fighting (20)
- cds (19)
- efficient markets (19)
- entrepreneurs (18)
- genetic engineering (18)
- podcasts (18)
- political correctness (18)
- quants (18)
- treasury bailout (17)
- black holes (16)
- cognitive science (16)
- geopolitics (16)
- history of science (16)
- intellectual history (16)
- mathematics (16)
- wall street (16)
- goldman sachs (15)
- google (15)
- literature (15)
- academia (14)
- bounded rationality (14)
- economic history (14)
- obama (14)
- silicon valley (14)
- statistics (14)
- ufc (14)
- athletics (13)
- berkeley (13)
- sci fi (13)
- security (13)
- freeman dyson (12)
- happiness (12)
- history (12)
- internet (12)
- japan (12)
- university of oregon (12)
- affirmative action (11)
- bjj (11)
- jiujitsu (11)
- race relations (11)
- feynman (10)
- harvard (10)
- hedonic treadmill (10)
- india (10)
- malcolm gladwell (10)
- movies (10)
- singularity (10)
- social networks (10)
- geeks (9)
- gender (9)
- politics (9)
- string theory (9)
- von Neumann (9)
- algorithms (8)
- entropy (8)
- film (8)
- italy (8)
- keynes (8)
- machine learning (8)
- mutants (8)
- nuclear weapons (8)
- physical training (8)
- robot genius (8)
- basketball (7)
- blogging (7)
- chess (7)
- complexity (7)
- computing (7)
- fitness (7)
- probability (7)
- quantum field theory (7)
- scifoo (7)
- venture capital (7)
- ability (6)
- aig (6)
- alan turing (6)
- anthropic principle (6)
- aspergers (6)
- autism (6)
- christmas (6)
- eugene (6)
- les grandes ecoles (6)
- music (6)
- nassim taleb (6)
- nerds (6)
- net worth (6)
- new yorker (6)
- nobel prize (6)
- olympics (6)
- qcd (6)
- real estate (6)
- realpolitik (6)
- television (6)
- volatility (6)
- wwii (6)
- Einstein (5)
- Fermi problems (5)
- academia sinica (5)
- ashkenazim (5)
- biotech (5)
- climate change (5)
- cosmology (5)
- cryptography (5)
- environmentalism (5)
- football (5)
- games (5)
- hugh everett (5)
- manhattan (5)
- neuroscience (5)
- personality (5)
- poker (5)
- prostitution (5)
- tail risk (5)
- teaching (5)
- turing test (5)
- usain bolt (5)
- Iran (4)
- Poincare (4)
- alpha (4)
- bayes (4)
- bobby fischer (4)
- borges (4)
- charles darwin (4)
- class (4)
- conferences (4)
- data mining (4)
- dating (4)
- determinism (4)
- dna (4)
- econtalk (4)
- energy (4)
- flynn effect (4)
- france (4)
- free will (4)
- fx (4)
- global warming (4)
- government (4)
- iraq war (4)
- kerviel (4)
- markets (4)
- neanderthals (4)
- oppenheimer (4)
- paris (4)
- perimeter institute (4)
- philip k. dick (4)
- privacy (4)
- pseudoscience (4)
- soros (4)
- trento (4)
- war (4)
- Go (3)
- art (3)
- babies (3)
- blade runner (3)
- brain drain (3)
- cambridge uk (3)
- censorship (3)
- charlie munger (3)
- crossfit (3)
- ecosystems (3)
- equity risk premium (3)
- facebook (3)
- fannie (3)
- fst (3)
- game theory (3)
- harvard society of fellows (3)
- hormones (3)
- humor (3)
- inequality (3)
- information theory (3)
- intellectual property (3)
- intellectual ventures (3)
- james salter (3)
- judo (3)
- kasparov (3)
- meritocracy (3)
- mixed martial arts (3)
- monsters (3)
- moore's law (3)
- nathan myhrvold (3)
- new york times (3)
- nonlinearity (3)
- patents (3)
- path integrals (3)
- philosophy of mind (3)
- renaissance technologies (3)
- risk preference (3)
- search (3)
- sivs (3)
- society generale (3)
- success (3)
- vietnam war (3)
- warren buffet (3)
- 100m (2)
- 200m (2)
- alibaba (2)
- assortative mating (2)
- bear stearns (2)
- bill gates (2)
- bruce springsteen (2)
- charles babbage (2)
- cloning (2)
- cold war (2)
- david mamet (2)
- democracy (2)
- digital books (2)
- donald mackenzie (2)
- eliot spitzer (2)
- empire (2)
- exchange rates (2)
- fake alpha (2)
- freddie (2)
- gaussian copula (2)
- godel (2)
- height (2)
- james watson (2)
- language (2)
- lewontin fallacy (2)
- lhc (2)
- ltcm (2)
- luck (2)
- magic (2)
- mccain (2)
- michael lewis (2)
- microsoft (2)
- national character (2)
- neal stephenson (2)
- nicholas metropolis (2)
- no holds barred (2)
- nsa (2)
- offices (2)
- oligarchs (2)
- olympiads (2)
- palin (2)
- pca (2)
- pop culture (2)
- population structure (2)
- rationality (2)
- russia (2)
- sec (2)
- skidelsky (2)
- socgen (2)
- solar energy (2)
- sprints (2)
- abx (1)
- anathem (1)
- andrew lo (1)
- antikythera mechanism (1)
- athens (1)
- atlas shrugged (1)
- ayn rand (1)
- bay area (1)
- beats (1)
- book search (1)
- bunnie huang (1)
- car dealers (1)
- carlos slim (1)
- catastrophe bonds (1)
- cdos (1)
- ces 2008 (1)
- chance (1)
- cheng ting hsu (1)
- chet baker (1)
- children (1)
- cochran-harpending (1)
- correlation (1)
- cpi (1)
- david x. li (1)
- demographics (1)
- dick cavett (1)
- dolomites (1)
- drugs (1)
- eharmony (1)
- encryption (1)
- epidemics (1)
- escorts (1)
- faces (1)
- fads (1)
- favorite posts (1)
- feminism (1)
- fiber optic cable (1)
- francis crick (1)
- gary brecher (1)
- geoffrey miller (1)
- gizmos (1)
- greece (1)
- greenspan (1)
- heinlein (1)
- hypocrisy (1)
- igon value (1)
- iit (1)
- industrial revolution (1)
- inflation (1)
- information asymmetry (1)
- iphone (1)
- jack kerouac (1)
- jaynes (1)
- jfk (1)
- jim simons (1)
- john dolan (1)
- john kerry (1)
- john paulson (1)
- john searle (1)
- john tierney (1)
- jonathan littell (1)
- las vegas (1)
- lawyers (1)
- lee kwan yew (1)
- lehman auction (1)
- les bienveillantes (1)
- lowell wood (1)
- lse (1)
- mating (1)
- mba (1)
- mcgeorge bundy (1)
- mexico (1)
- michael jackson (1)
- mickey rourke (1)
- migration (1)
- mit (1)
- money:tech (1)
- monkeys (1)
- myron scholes (1)
- netwon institute (1)
- networks (1)
- newton institute (1)
- nfl (1)
- noam chomsky (1)
- oliver stone (1)
- phil gramm (1)
- philanthropy (1)
- philip greenspun (1)
- portfolio theory (1)
- power laws (1)
- prisoner's dilemma (1)
- quantum computers (1)
- randomness (1)
- recession (1)
- sad but true (1)
- sales (1)
- satoshi kanazawa (1)
- simulation (1)
- singapore (1)
- skype (1)
- software development (1)
- standard deviation (1)
- star wars (1)
- starship troopers (1)
- students today (1)
- supercomputers (1)
- systemic risk (1)
- teleportation (1)
- thailand (1)
- tierney lab blog (1)
- tomonaga (1)
- twitter (1)
- tyler cowen (1)
- ussr (1)
- variance (1)
- venice (1)
- violence (1)
- virtual meetings (1)
- virtual reality (1)
- war nerd (1)
- wealth effect (1)