It doesn't seem like a lot of saliva, but it took some work to reach the fill line. Ready to go!
Thursday, May 31, 2012
Do not eat this kit
I'm one of the laggards in returning my DNA kit. It's been sitting on my desk for months -- a miracle that my kids haven't ripped it apart by now. To volunteer, see here.
It doesn't seem like a lot of saliva, but it took some work to reach the fill line. Ready to go!
Unofficially, and off the record, some genotyping is going to happen in late summer. Nuff said.
It doesn't seem like a lot of saliva, but it took some work to reach the fill line. Ready to go!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
Labels
- physics (325)
- genetics (262)
- finance (257)
- globalization (248)
- brainpower (236)
- technology (180)
- american society (169)
- China (162)
- economics (158)
- psychometrics (153)
- photos (152)
- science (150)
- genomics (149)
- innovation (135)
- psychology (133)
- travel (125)
- credit crisis (115)
- universities (109)
- higher education (107)
- human capital (105)
- biology (103)
- ai (98)
- iq (96)
- genetic engineering (89)
- startups (89)
- cognitive science (84)
- credit crunch (78)
- careers (75)
- machine learning (74)
- evolution (71)
- gilded age (71)
- elitism (70)
- income inequality (69)
- autobiographical (68)
- statistics (66)
- books (61)
- quantum mechanics (59)
- caltech (57)
- genius (57)
- social science (57)
- politics (50)
- talks (50)
- political correctness (49)
- bgi (48)
- bounded rationality (48)
- history of science (48)
- mma (48)
- sci fi (48)
- geopolitics (47)
- kids (47)
- education (46)
- cdo (45)
- silicon valley (45)
- academia (42)
- derivatives (42)
- mathematics (41)
- podcasts (41)
- harvard (39)
- behavioral economics (38)
- intellectual history (37)
- bubbles (36)
- history (36)
- mortgages (36)
- realpolitik (36)
- MSU (35)
- literature (35)
- jiujitsu (34)
- computing (32)
- expert prediction (32)
- film (32)
- hedge funds (32)
- bjj (30)
- foo camp (30)
- physical training (30)
- ufc (30)
- quants (29)
- efficient markets (28)
- google (28)
- many worlds (28)
- black holes (27)
- economic history (27)
- neuroscience (27)
- sports (27)
- von Neumann (26)
- entrepreneurs (25)
- movies (25)
- nuclear weapons (25)
- subprime (25)
- feynman (24)
- housing (24)
- obama (24)
- singularity (24)
- taiwan (24)
- race relations (23)
- berkeley (22)
- ultimate fighting (22)
- athletics (21)
- music (21)
- wall street (21)
- affirmative action (20)
- cds (20)
- scifoo (20)
- security (19)
- biotech (18)
- gender (18)
- goldman sachs (18)
- internet (17)
- meritocracy (17)
- quantum field theory (17)
- treasury bailout (17)
- university of oregon (17)
- venture capital (17)
- blogging (16)
- conferences (16)
- freeman dyson (16)
- smpy (16)
- autism (15)
- cosmology (15)
- cryptography (15)
- japan (15)
- oppenheimer (15)
- personality (15)
- algorithms (14)
- happiness (14)
- new yorker (14)
- hedonic treadmill (13)
- height (13)
- probability (13)
- wwii (13)
- aspergers (12)
- fitness (12)
- india (12)
- malcolm gladwell (12)
- net worth (12)
- nobel prize (12)
- social networks (12)
- television (12)
- chess (11)
- christmas (11)
- dna (11)
- geeks (11)
- les grandes ecoles (11)
- neanderthals (11)
- string theory (11)
- blade runner (10)
- entropy (10)
- football (10)
- government (10)
- italy (10)
- mutants (10)
- nerds (10)
- olympics (10)
- privacy (10)
- pseudoscience (10)
- Einstein (9)
- ability (9)
- complexity (9)
- dating (9)
- eugene (9)
- flynn effect (9)
- crossfit (8)
- determinism (8)
- encryption (8)
- harvard society of fellows (8)
- keynes (8)
- nsa (8)
- pca (8)
- philip k. dick (8)
- philosophy of mind (8)
- pop culture (8)
- real estate (8)
- research (8)
- robot genius (8)
- usain bolt (8)
- Go (7)
- aig (7)
- alpha (7)
- art (7)
- ashkenazim (7)
- basketball (7)
- data mining (7)
- energy (7)
- free will (7)
- game theory (7)
- games (7)
- hugh everett (7)
- james salter (7)
- manhattan (7)
- poker (7)
- qcd (7)
- russia (7)
- turing test (7)
- video (7)
- war (7)
- Fermi problems (6)
- alan turing (6)
- anthropic principle (6)
- bayes (6)
- class (6)
- climate change (6)
- environmentalism (6)
- france (6)
- fx (6)
- nassim taleb (6)
- noam chomsky (6)
- prostitution (6)
- success (6)
- tail risk (6)
- teaching (6)
- volatility (6)
- academia sinica (5)
- bobby fischer (5)
- democracy (5)
- econtalk (5)
- luck (5)
- paris (5)
- patents (5)
- renaissance technologies (5)
- sad but true (5)
- software development (5)
- warren buffet (5)
- 100m (4)
- Iran (4)
- Poincare (4)
- bill gates (4)
- borges (4)
- cambridge uk (4)
- charles darwin (4)
- cold war (4)
- creativity (4)
- fake alpha (4)
- feminism (4)
- global warming (4)
- godel (4)
- hormones (4)
- humor (4)
- inequality (4)
- intellectual property (4)
- iraq war (4)
- kasparov (4)
- kerviel (4)
- markets (4)
- microsoft (4)
- mixed martial arts (4)
- monsters (4)
- moore's law (4)
- nonlinearity (4)
- perimeter institute (4)
- solar energy (4)
- soros (4)
- trento (4)
- vietnam war (4)
- 200m (3)
- babies (3)
- brain drain (3)
- censorship (3)
- charlie munger (3)
- chet baker (3)
- correlation (3)
- demographics (3)
- ecosystems (3)
- equity risk premium (3)
- facebook (3)
- fannie (3)
- fst (3)
- information theory (3)
- intellectual ventures (3)
- jim simons (3)
- judo (3)
- language (3)
- lee kwan yew (3)
- lewontin fallacy (3)
- lhc (3)
- magic (3)
- michael lewis (3)
- nathan myhrvold (3)
- neal stephenson (3)
- new york times (3)
- olympiads (3)
- path integrals (3)
- quantum computers (3)
- rationality (3)
- risk preference (3)
- search (3)
- sec (3)
- sivs (3)
- society generale (3)
- thailand (3)
- alibaba (2)
- assortative mating (2)
- bear stearns (2)
- bruce springsteen (2)
- charles babbage (2)
- cheng ting hsu (2)
- cloning (2)
- david mamet (2)
- digital books (2)
- donald mackenzie (2)
- drones (2)
- eliot spitzer (2)
- empire (2)
- exchange rates (2)
- freddie (2)
- gaussian copula (2)
- heinlein (2)
- industrial revolution (2)
- james watson (2)
- ltcm (2)
- mating (2)
- mba (2)
- mccain (2)
- monkeys (2)
- national character (2)
- nicholas metropolis (2)
- no holds barred (2)
- offices (2)
- oligarchs (2)
- palin (2)
- population structure (2)
- prisoner's dilemma (2)
- simulation (2)
- skidelsky (2)
- socgen (2)
- sprints (2)
- supercomputers (2)
- systemic risk (2)
- variance (2)
- virtual reality (2)
- abx (1)
- anathem (1)
- andrew lo (1)
- antikythera mechanism (1)
- athens (1)
- atlas shrugged (1)
- ayn rand (1)
- bay area (1)
- beats (1)
- book search (1)
- bunnie huang (1)
- car dealers (1)
- carlos slim (1)
- catastrophe bonds (1)
- cdos (1)
- ces 2008 (1)
- chance (1)
- children (1)
- cochran-harpending (1)
- cpi (1)
- david x. li (1)
- dick cavett (1)
- dolomites (1)
- drugs (1)
- dune (1)
- eharmony (1)
- epidemics (1)
- escorts (1)
- faces (1)
- fads (1)
- favorite posts (1)
- fiber optic cable (1)
- francis crick (1)
- frauds (1)
- gary brecher (1)
- gizmos (1)
- greece (1)
- greenspan (1)
- hypocrisy (1)
- igon value (1)
- iit (1)
- inflation (1)
- information asymmetry (1)
- iphone (1)
- jack kerouac (1)
- jaynes (1)
- jfk (1)
- john dolan (1)
- john kerry (1)
- john paulson (1)
- john searle (1)
- john tierney (1)
- jonathan littell (1)
- las vegas (1)
- lawyers (1)
- lehman auction (1)
- les bienveillantes (1)
- lowell wood (1)
- lse (1)
- mcgeorge bundy (1)
- mexico (1)
- michael jackson (1)
- mickey rourke (1)
- migration (1)
- mit (1)
- money:tech (1)
- myron scholes (1)
- netwon institute (1)
- networks (1)
- newton institute (1)
- nfl (1)
- oliver stone (1)
- phil gramm (1)
- philanthropy (1)
- philip greenspun (1)
- portfolio theory (1)
- power laws (1)
- pyschology (1)
- randomness (1)
- recession (1)
- sales (1)
- singapore (1)
- skype (1)
- standard deviation (1)
- star wars (1)
- starship troopers (1)
- students today (1)
- teleportation (1)
- tierney lab blog (1)
- tomonaga (1)
- twitter (1)
- tyler cowen (1)
- ussr (1)
- venice (1)
- violence (1)
- virtual meetings (1)
- war nerd (1)
- wealth effect (1)
14 comments:
What is the male:female ratio of eligibility based on automatic qualifying criteria? It seems the criteria would skew even more heavily male than the natural population.
I wonder if Steve set the admission criteria to assure his own admission.
If I sent in my dog's saliva would you be able to tell?
Can you help me.Save me.Please visit on my blog and make it a little of change for me.This is not spam or scam.It's true,im realy realy need your help.Thank you. http://finasihblog.blogspot.com
My sample laid around the house for at least a month before I got myself organized enough to mail it. Fortunately, Oragene's FAQ reports that their collection kits are still usable after over a year at room temperature.
Will the initial round of genotyping be able to detect CNVs? I had mine sequenced through 23andme, but their tech didn't do CNVs or deletions. I wonder if I'll get anything out of this or if I volunteered my DNA out of the goodness of my heart.
A. The goodness of you heart.
Unofficially, and off the record, we will be doing whole genome sequencing instead of SNPs. So you will eventually get a lot more information than you did from 23andMe. You will likely be among the first 10k or so humans to be sequenced at this level of coverage.
that's badass. any idea yet when we could expect results?
Runs scheduled for Sept 2012. Will take a while to process and clean data.
I admit I was distressed to learn that the samples had not even been sent to Hong Kong yet. Thanks for some positive news.
That's awesome!
http://ukpmc.ac.uk/abstract/MED/8883493
Another example of why this study will probably be useless and meaningless except of course for indeological purposes.
Better compare the DNA of standard poodles to Afghans. Dog breeds do have genetically determined psychological traits in my experience.
Totally tubular.
A run to sequence whole human genome takes roughly 10 days on Illumina's HiSeq. With roughly 100 machines, that's 300 genomes per month. Your stated goal is N >3000 IIRC, so it sounds like a year worth of sequencing alone.
Your estimates seem way too high. Also keep in mind the coverage level.
600 GB/wk is doable now, which is many complete human genomes per week on a single machine.
Post a Comment