Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
Labels
- physics (378)
- genetics (305)
- globalization (282)
- finance (268)
- brainpower (265)
- genomics (255)
- technology (240)
- american society (234)
- China (213)
- innovation (195)
- economics (185)
- ai (184)
- psychometrics (174)
- science (166)
- photos (162)
- psychology (159)
- machine learning (148)
- biology (144)
- travel (142)
- universities (133)
- genetic engineering (132)
- higher education (126)
- human capital (120)
- credit crisis (115)
- startups (113)
- iq (106)
- cognitive science (99)
- podcasts (98)
- autobiographical (88)
- political correctness (88)
- careers (85)
- politics (85)
- geopolitics (84)
- statistics (80)
- credit crunch (78)
- elitism (76)
- evolution (76)
- quantum mechanics (75)
- bounded rationality (74)
- gilded age (73)
- social science (73)
- income inequality (72)
- talks (72)
- genius (71)
- history of science (67)
- caltech (64)
- realpolitik (64)
- books (62)
- MSU (60)
- mma (57)
- sci fi (57)
- academia (55)
- biotech (55)
- harvard (54)
- silicon valley (54)
- mathematics (52)
- history (50)
- kids (50)
- education (49)
- intellectual history (49)
- bgi (48)
- cdo (45)
- derivatives (43)
- neuroscience (43)
- behavioral economics (41)
- jiujitsu (41)
- literature (41)
- video (40)
- physical training (39)
- computing (37)
- ufc (37)
- bjj (36)
- bubbles (36)
- film (36)
- mortgages (36)
- google (35)
- economic history (34)
- expert prediction (34)
- many worlds (34)
- affirmative action (33)
- hedge funds (33)
- nuclear weapons (32)
- race relations (31)
- security (31)
- von Neumann (31)
- black holes (30)
- quants (30)
- efficient markets (29)
- feynman (29)
- foo camp (29)
- movies (29)
- sports (29)
- music (28)
- singularity (26)
- entrepreneurs (25)
- housing (25)
- meritocracy (25)
- obama (25)
- subprime (25)
- berkeley (24)
- taiwan (24)
- conferences (23)
- epidemics (23)
- venture capital (23)
- athletics (22)
- quantum field theory (22)
- ultimate fighting (22)
- wall street (22)
- cds (20)
- internet (20)
- blogging (19)
- scifoo (19)
- gender (18)
- goldman sachs (18)
- new yorker (18)
- cryptography (17)
- dna (17)
- freeman dyson (17)
- smpy (17)
- treasury bailout (17)
- university of oregon (17)
- algorithms (16)
- japan (16)
- personality (16)
- privacy (16)
- autism (15)
- christmas (15)
- cosmology (15)
- happiness (15)
- height (15)
- oppenheimer (15)
- Fermi problems (14)
- fitness (14)
- les grandes ecoles (14)
- social networks (14)
- wwii (14)
- chess (13)
- government (13)
- hedonic treadmill (13)
- india (13)
- neanderthals (13)
- probability (13)
- research (13)
- russia (13)
- war (13)
- aspergers (12)
- blade runner (12)
- malcolm gladwell (12)
- net worth (12)
- nobel prize (12)
- nsa (12)
- philosophy of mind (12)
- Einstein (11)
- entropy (11)
- geeks (11)
- harvard society of fellows (11)
- string theory (11)
- television (11)
- Go (10)
- ability (10)
- art (10)
- climate change (10)
- cold war (10)
- football (10)
- italy (10)
- mutants (10)
- nerds (10)
- olympics (10)
- pseudoscience (10)
- complexity (9)
- crossfit (9)
- democracy (9)
- encryption (9)
- energy (9)
- eugene (9)
- flynn effect (9)
- france (9)
- james salter (9)
- pop culture (9)
- turing test (9)
- alan turing (8)
- alpha (8)
- data mining (8)
- dating (8)
- determinism (8)
- games (8)
- keynes (8)
- manhattan (8)
- pca (8)
- philip k. dick (8)
- qcd (8)
- quantum computers (8)
- real estate (8)
- robot genius (8)
- success (8)
- usain bolt (8)
- Iran (7)
- aig (7)
- ashkenazim (7)
- basketball (7)
- environmentalism (7)
- free will (7)
- fx (7)
- game theory (7)
- hugh everett (7)
- new york times (7)
- paris (7)
- patents (7)
- poker (7)
- simulation (7)
- tail risk (7)
- teaching (7)
- volatility (7)
- anthropic principle (6)
- bayes (6)
- class (6)
- drones (6)
- godel (6)
- inequality (6)
- intellectual property (6)
- markets (6)
- nassim taleb (6)
- noam chomsky (6)
- prostitution (6)
- rationality (6)
- academia sinica (5)
- bobby fischer (5)
- econtalk (5)
- fake alpha (5)
- global warming (5)
- information theory (5)
- iraq war (5)
- kasparov (5)
- luck (5)
- nonlinearity (5)
- perimeter institute (5)
- renaissance technologies (5)
- sad but true (5)
- software development (5)
- vietnam war (5)
- warren buffet (5)
- 100m (4)
- Poincare (4)
- bill gates (4)
- borges (4)
- cambridge uk (4)
- censorship (4)
- charles darwin (4)
- creativity (4)
- demographics (4)
- hormones (4)
- humor (4)
- judo (4)
- kerviel (4)
- microsoft (4)
- mixed martial arts (4)
- monsters (4)
- moore's law (4)
- solar energy (4)
- soros (4)
- trento (4)
- 200m (3)
- assortative mating (3)
- babies (3)
- brain drain (3)
- charlie munger (3)
- cheng ting hsu (3)
- chet baker (3)
- correlation (3)
- ecosystems (3)
- equity risk premium (3)
- facebook (3)
- fannie (3)
- feminism (3)
- fst (3)
- intellectual ventures (3)
- jim simons (3)
- language (3)
- lee kwan yew (3)
- lewontin fallacy (3)
- lhc (3)
- magic (3)
- michael lewis (3)
- nathan myhrvold (3)
- neal stephenson (3)
- olympiads (3)
- path integrals (3)
- risk preference (3)
- search (3)
- sec (3)
- sivs (3)
- society generale (3)
- supercomputers (3)
- systemic risk (3)
- thailand (3)
- alibaba (2)
- bear stearns (2)
- bruce springsteen (2)
- charles babbage (2)
- cloning (2)
- computers (2)
- david mamet (2)
- digital books (2)
- donald mackenzie (2)
- drugs (2)
- eliot spitzer (2)
- empire (2)
- exchange rates (2)
- frauds (2)
- freddie (2)
- gaussian copula (2)
- heinlein (2)
- industrial revolution (2)
- james watson (2)
- ltcm (2)
- mating (2)
- mba (2)
- mccain (2)
- mit (2)
- monkeys (2)
- national character (2)
- nicholas metropolis (2)
- no holds barred (2)
- offices (2)
- oligarchs (2)
- palin (2)
- population structure (2)
- prisoner's dilemma (2)
- skidelsky (2)
- socgen (2)
- sprints (2)
- twitter (2)
- ussr (2)
- variance (2)
- virtual reality (2)
- abx (1)
- anathem (1)
- andrew lo (1)
- antikythera mechanism (1)
- athens (1)
- atlas shrugged (1)
- ayn rand (1)
- bay area (1)
- beats (1)
- book search (1)
- bunnie huang (1)
- car dealers (1)
- carlos slim (1)
- catastrophe bonds (1)
- cdos (1)
- ces 2008 (1)
- chance (1)
- children (1)
- cochran-harpending (1)
- cpi (1)
- david x. li (1)
- dick cavett (1)
- dolomites (1)
- dune (1)
- eharmony (1)
- escorts (1)
- faces (1)
- fads (1)
- favorite posts (1)
- fiber optic cable (1)
- francis crick (1)
- gary brecher (1)
- gizmos (1)
- greece (1)
- greenspan (1)
- hypocrisy (1)
- igon value (1)
- iit (1)
- inflation (1)
- information asymmetry (1)
- iphone (1)
- jack kerouac (1)
- jaynes (1)
- jazz (1)
- jfk (1)
- john dolan (1)
- john kerry (1)
- john paulson (1)
- john searle (1)
- john tierney (1)
- jonathan littell (1)
- las vegas (1)
- lawyers (1)
- lehman auction (1)
- les bienveillantes (1)
- lowell wood (1)
- lse (1)
- machine (1)
- mcgeorge bundy (1)
- mexico (1)
- michael jackson (1)
- mickey rourke (1)
- migration (1)
- money:tech (1)
- myron scholes (1)
- netwon institute (1)
- networks (1)
- newton institute (1)
- nfl (1)
- oliver stone (1)
- phil gramm (1)
- philanthropy (1)
- philip greenspun (1)
- portfolio theory (1)
- power laws (1)
- pyschology (1)
- randomness (1)
- recession (1)
- sales (1)
- singapore (1)
- skype (1)
- standard deviation (1)
- star wars (1)
- starship troopers (1)
- students today (1)
- teleportation (1)
- tierney lab blog (1)
- tomonaga (1)
- tyler cowen (1)
- venice (1)
- violence (1)
- virtual meetings (1)
- war nerd (1)
- wealth effect (1)
22 comments:
..
I'll be taking the bus to longwood for the first time ever, just for this.
He has more than one ghost? An interesting idea, like two time dimensions.
Good luck.
Awesome!
Isn't he supposed to be in the 9th circle of Hell, as per his oath in the Mismeasure of Man concerning whether he misrepresented anything regarding the subject and in light of recent evidence that he falsified a good bit of evidence?
Just trying to get lynched, huh?
Any real new data or is it more of the same "we've got incredible sequencing power, many samples from high IQ people and this really simple model that we hope will work"?
Not quite. I think the 9th circle is reserved for those who do that solely for personal gain, without any ideological reasons for it.
Gould is in the 4th circle of hell.
I was wondering that as well. Am I wrong in thinking that this is mainly an effort to recruit more subjects?
Interesting thing from my own experience: I sent the study to an automatic qualifier, and he volunteered. But he didn't forward it to other automatic qualifiers he knew (and he knows quite a few). He thought it would be kind of tacky to refer other people (though he was excited about being part of it himself).
We aren't announcing any results. These talks are mainly for recruiting and to get the community ready. The simple model you refer to is the usual one for additive genetic variance.
Gould specifically requested the 9th circle in his oath in the intro to 'The Mismeasure of Man'. The 9th circle is normally reserved for traitors to someone who is a benefactor who one owes allegiance to. I'm sure the Prince of Darkness could stretch the definition a little (substituting a reified 'Science' for Caeser or Jesus for Gould's sake).
Very odd. Gould's mis-statements, as I said above, seem to well transgress the bounds of mere misunderstanding; he was lying, and he knew he was lying. Did he think others wouldn't figure it out at some point? Most likely he held out hope, against hope, that the racial differences would be demonstrated false. Obviously a naive view, but I think it's consistent with the general impression of people here that Gould was not all that intelligent.
He would have done his cause a much better service if he had been honest, and confronted the issue on purely humane and ethical grounds.
***Obviously a naive view, but I think it's consistent with the general impression of people here that Gould was not all that intelligent.***
I think it's more likely he was simply being a radical marxist activist, similar to other 'Science for the People' & 'Sociobiology Study Group' types like Lewontin, Leon Kamin & Steven Rose.
http://tinyurl.com/7ldfr94
"I think it's consistent with the general impression of people here that Gould was not all that intelligent..."
"I think it's more likely he was simply being a radical marxist activist..."
The two possibilities aren't mutually exclusive, and it's easy to imagine that they might tend to reinforce each other.
I have a question: does anybody reading this know anything about Gould on a personal level? Beyond the saintly image of him presented in the media? Any good rumors or gossip, in other words?
I can see that you are putting a lot of time and effort into your blog and detailed articles! I am deeply in love with every single piece of information you post here
How many participants have you got so far? Maybe I'll add my outlier to your data.
"So there was this one guy who should never have learned to speak according to our model..."
"people here" either haven't read the whole of The Mismeasure or didn't understand it.
Gould may have been low M compared to Steve Hsu, but he was high M and high V compared to Hernstein and Murray and ALL psychologists.
Please volunteer. We have something like 500 right now but want to get into the multi thousands.
If I may ask, were you diagnosed as autistic?
***Gould may have been low M compared to Steve Hsu, but he was high M and high V compared to Hernstein and Murray and ALL psychologists. ***
Not including Eysenck & Jensen.
Post a Comment