This talk is long but very good. If you are impatient you can skip to the last 3 minutes where Merton answers a question about the CDS market that has been widely discussed. He points out the value for real world companies of being able to transfer credit risk as opposed to the narrower application of insuring a bond that they actually own.
The central point of the first part of the talk  the embedded put option in a plain vanilla loan, and associated nonlinearities  is nice but I don't think it is as essential to the current crisis as he suggests. (It's obviously in his interests to downplay the complexity of new financial instruments relative to traditional ones. The difference, of course, is that we've had much more time to get used to the traditional ones and build the proper safeguards and regulatory systems.) Merton is refreshingly modest about his understanding of the complex causes of the crisis. At one point he notes that the post mortem investigation into the crisis is unlikely to produce a Feynman moment, in which someone holds up an Oring that caused the disaster!
Here is another link in case the player below doesn't work for you.
I sat in on Merton's graduate class on options pricing theory at Harvard in the early 1990s. I still have the lecture notes and a black paperback copy of Continuous Time Finance. He seemed much more confident at the time, but of course that was before LTCM :)
I was one of the first people to recast options pricing theory into the language of Feynman path integrals. (You don't need the power of quantum field theory for this; the log of the price of the underlying security is just the position of a particle in simple 1D quantum mechanics in imaginary time  i.e., it's just Brownian motion.) A friend of mine had been assigned a thesis project by Andy Lo at MIT, to price a certain type of exotic, path dependent option sold by Citibank. Lo didn't know the option could be priced in closed form (neither did Citi, it turns out); he asked my friend to do it numerically by brute force Monte Carlo. Using path integrals I found an exact expression for my friend, which agreed perfectly with his simulations.
Pessimism of the Intellect, Optimism of the Will Archive Favorite posts Twitter: @steve_hsu
Sunday, April 12, 2009
blog comments powered by Disqus
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive

▼
2009
(204)

▼
04
(19)
 Life path integral
 Pandemics
 US Human Development Indices
 Neuroenhancement
 New York Times nearing bankruptcy
 Financial crisis and economics at Perimeter
 50 years of John Searle at Berkeley
 The Quiet Coup
 James Yang graphic art
 Quantum books
 Life magazine photos
 Merton on the financial crisis
 Sugar Daddies: MIT grad starts high end prostituti...
 Rationality vs Intelligence
 Lawyerland
 A physicist from Iran
 Theories of games
 Netbooks and the twilight of wintel dominance?
 The future of innovation

▼
04
(19)
Labels
 physics (282)
 finance (242)
 globalization (216)
 genetics (196)
 brainpower (186)
 photos (128)
 credit crisis (115)
 economics (115)
 technology (115)
 China (114)
 science (113)
 american society (111)
 psychometrics (102)
 travel (97)
 innovation (80)
 universities (80)
 credit crunch (78)
 human capital (78)
 higher education (74)
 psychology (74)
 iq (73)
 startups (72)
 gilded age (66)
 income inequality (60)
 careers (59)
 elitism (58)
 biology (57)
 autobiographical (54)
 cognitive science (51)
 books (50)
 ai (49)
 quantum mechanics (49)
 evolution (48)
 cdo (45)
 genius (45)
 bgi (43)
 caltech (43)
 derivatives (41)
 kids (41)
 social science (40)
 genetic engineering (37)
 statistics (37)
 mortgages (36)
 talks (36)
 bubbles (35)
 behavioral economics (34)
 mma (34)
 education (32)
 history of science (32)
 bounded rationality (30)
 hedge funds (30)
 mathematics (29)
 intellectual history (28)
 efficient markets (27)
 literature (26)
 many worlds (26)
 silicon valley (26)
 black holes (25)
 quants (25)
 sports (25)
 subprime (25)
 entrepreneurs (24)
 expert prediction (24)
 housing (24)
 podcasts (24)
 taiwan (24)
 MSU (23)
 academia (23)
 foo camp (23)
 genomics (23)
 geopolitics (23)
 political correctness (23)
 obama (22)
 physical training (21)
 sci fi (21)
 ultimate fighting (21)
 athletics (20)
 film (20)
 ufc (20)
 wall street (20)
 berkeley (19)
 cds (19)
 feynman (19)
 jiujitsu (19)
 economic history (18)
 goldman sachs (18)
 history (18)
 machine learning (18)
 movies (18)
 affirmative action (17)
 google (17)
 treasury bailout (17)
 bjj (16)
 harvard (16)
 race relations (16)
 security (16)
 computing (15)
 freeman dyson (15)
 japan (15)
 von Neumann (15)
 internet (14)
 university of oregon (14)
 neuroscience (13)
 nuclear weapons (13)
 quantum field theory (13)
 realpolitik (13)
 singularity (13)
 biotech (12)
 blogging (12)
 gender (12)
 happiness (12)
 india (12)
 oppenheimer (12)
 politics (12)
 probability (12)
 hedonic treadmill (11)
 malcolm gladwell (11)
 meritocracy (11)
 music (11)
 personality (11)
 venture capital (11)
 algorithms (10)
 autism (10)
 cosmology (10)
 mutants (10)
 olympics (10)
 social networks (10)
 string theory (10)
 aspergers (9)
 conferences (9)
 entropy (9)
 fitness (9)
 geeks (9)
 neanderthals (9)
 net worth (9)
 wwii (9)
 chess (8)
 cryptography (8)
 italy (8)
 keynes (8)
 new yorker (8)
 nobel prize (8)
 robot genius (8)
 scifoo (8)
 usain bolt (8)
 ability (7)
 aig (7)
 alpha (7)
 ashkenazim (7)
 basketball (7)
 christmas (7)
 complexity (7)
 crossfit (7)
 eugene (7)
 flynn effect (7)
 football (7)
 harvard society of fellows (7)
 hugh everett (7)
 manhattan (7)
 nerds (7)
 real estate (7)
 television (7)
 Einstein (6)
 alan turing (6)
 anthropic principle (6)
 art (6)
 blade runner (6)
 data mining (6)
 dating (6)
 dna (6)
 fx (6)
 les grandes ecoles (6)
 nassim taleb (6)
 qcd (6)
 teaching (6)
 turing test (6)
 volatility (6)
 Fermi problems (5)
 academia sinica (5)
 bayes (5)
 bobby fischer (5)
 climate change (5)
 determinism (5)
 energy (5)
 environmentalism (5)
 france (5)
 free will (5)
 games (5)
 james salter (5)
 noam chomsky (5)
 philip k. dick (5)
 philosophy of mind (5)
 poker (5)
 privacy (5)
 prostitution (5)
 software development (5)
 success (5)
 tail risk (5)
 war (5)
 warren buffet (5)
 100m (4)
 Iran (4)
 Poincare (4)
 borges (4)
 cambridge uk (4)
 charles darwin (4)
 class (4)
 econtalk (4)
 fake alpha (4)
 game theory (4)
 global warming (4)
 government (4)
 height (4)
 hormones (4)
 humor (4)
 inequality (4)
 iraq war (4)
 kerviel (4)
 luck (4)
 markets (4)
 microsoft (4)
 monsters (4)
 nsa (4)
 paris (4)
 perimeter institute (4)
 pseudoscience (4)
 renaissance technologies (4)
 russia (4)
 soros (4)
 trento (4)
 vietnam war (4)
 200m (3)
 Go (3)
 babies (3)
 bill gates (3)
 brain drain (3)
 censorship (3)
 charlie munger (3)
 chet baker (3)
 cold war (3)
 creativity (3)
 demographics (3)
 ecosystems (3)
 encryption (3)
 equity risk premium (3)
 facebook (3)
 fannie (3)
 feminism (3)
 fst (3)
 godel (3)
 information theory (3)
 intellectual property (3)
 intellectual ventures (3)
 judo (3)
 kasparov (3)
 lewontin fallacy (3)
 lhc (3)
 mixed martial arts (3)
 moore's law (3)
 nathan myhrvold (3)
 neal stephenson (3)
 new york times (3)
 nonlinearity (3)
 patents (3)
 path integrals (3)
 quantum computers (3)
 research (3)
 risk preference (3)
 sad but true (3)
 search (3)
 sec (3)
 sivs (3)
 society generale (3)
 solar energy (3)
 alibaba (2)
 assortative mating (2)
 bear stearns (2)
 bruce springsteen (2)
 charles babbage (2)
 cloning (2)
 correlation (2)
 david mamet (2)
 democracy (2)
 digital books (2)
 donald mackenzie (2)
 eliot spitzer (2)
 empire (2)
 exchange rates (2)
 freddie (2)
 gaussian copula (2)
 industrial revolution (2)
 james watson (2)
 language (2)
 ltcm (2)
 magic (2)
 mba (2)
 mccain (2)
 michael lewis (2)
 national character (2)
 nicholas metropolis (2)
 no holds barred (2)
 offices (2)
 oligarchs (2)
 olympiads (2)
 palin (2)
 pca (2)
 pop culture (2)
 population structure (2)
 prisoner's dilemma (2)
 rationality (2)
 skidelsky (2)
 socgen (2)
 sprints (2)
 thailand (2)
 variance (2)
 abx (1)
 anathem (1)
 andrew lo (1)
 antikythera mechanism (1)
 athens (1)
 atlas shrugged (1)
 ayn rand (1)
 bay area (1)
 beats (1)
 book search (1)
 bunnie huang (1)
 car dealers (1)
 carlos slim (1)
 catastrophe bonds (1)
 cdos (1)
 ces 2008 (1)
 chance (1)
 cheng ting hsu (1)
 children (1)
 cochranharpending (1)
 cpi (1)
 david x. li (1)
 dick cavett (1)
 dolomites (1)
 drugs (1)
 eharmony (1)
 epidemics (1)
 escorts (1)
 faces (1)
 fads (1)
 favorite posts (1)
 fiber optic cable (1)
 francis crick (1)
 gary brecher (1)
 gizmos (1)
 greece (1)
 greenspan (1)
 heinlein (1)
 hypocrisy (1)
 igon value (1)
 iit (1)
 inflation (1)
 information asymmetry (1)
 iphone (1)
 jack kerouac (1)
 jaynes (1)
 jfk (1)
 jim simons (1)
 john dolan (1)
 john kerry (1)
 john paulson (1)
 john searle (1)
 john tierney (1)
 jonathan littell (1)
 las vegas (1)
 lawyers (1)
 lee kwan yew (1)
 lehman auction (1)
 les bienveillantes (1)
 lowell wood (1)
 lse (1)
 mating (1)
 mcgeorge bundy (1)
 mexico (1)
 michael jackson (1)
 mickey rourke (1)
 migration (1)
 mit (1)
 money:tech (1)
 monkeys (1)
 myron scholes (1)
 netwon institute (1)
 networks (1)
 newton institute (1)
 nfl (1)
 oliver stone (1)
 phil gramm (1)
 philanthropy (1)
 philip greenspun (1)
 portfolio theory (1)
 power laws (1)
 randomness (1)
 recession (1)
 sales (1)
 simulation (1)
 singapore (1)
 skype (1)
 smpy (1)
 standard deviation (1)
 star wars (1)
 starship troopers (1)
 students today (1)
 supercomputers (1)
 systemic risk (1)
 teleportation (1)
 tierney lab blog (1)
 tomonaga (1)
 twitter (1)
 tyler cowen (1)
 ussr (1)
 venice (1)
 violence (1)
 virtual meetings (1)
 virtual reality (1)
 war nerd (1)
 wealth effect (1)