tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post5718065579988643025..comments2020-11-29T02:07:43.911-05:00Comments on Information Processing: Wonderlic funSteve Hsuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02428333897272913660noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-49830211118872009362011-11-18T21:14:15.940-05:002011-11-18T21:14:15.940-05:00The number 11 is easy. Its an equation: (x is equa...The number 11 is easy. Its an equation: (x is equal to number of large pages)<br />[<br />2400x + 1800 (21-x) = 48000<br />2400x + 37800-1800x = 48000<br />600x + 37800 = 48000<br />600x = 10200<br />x = 10200/600 = 17<br />]<br />So if large pages are 17 (2400 times x), small pages are 4 (21-x = 21-17 = 4)<br /><br />Regards!Adrià Farrés Garcianoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-46939438488639724282009-01-22T02:57:00.000-05:002009-01-22T02:57:00.000-05:00so since I didn't time myself to the second, the t...so since I didn't time myself to the second, the time on my test could have been anything from just over 3 min to just under 5min (I took the test from 2:18 to 2:22).<BR/><BR/>assuming I took 4 min (the average), I took 1.11 times as much time as I should have. Penalizing my IQ score accordingly (multiplying my 140 by .9) I come up with a 126, with a lower bound of 100--if I took 5 min--and an valiance.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02072370158412284072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-71652743225311023352009-01-22T02:30:00.000-05:002009-01-22T02:30:00.000-05:0012/15 ~4 minmissed 11-1311 I rushed through12 I si...12/15 ~4 min<BR/>missed 11-13<BR/>11 I rushed through<BR/>12 I simply got wrong and still confuses me<BR/>and 13 was an arithmetic error<BR/><BR/>the estimate of my IQ is maybe 10 pts lower than what I was tested at as a child, but considering I've seen this test before maybe my real intelligence is even lower than the Wonderlic predicts :Pvaliance.https://www.blogger.com/profile/02072370158412284072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-7161530019128699812008-09-05T19:21:00.000-04:002008-09-05T19:21:00.000-04:00#12 could be any of the months have the same dayli...#12 could be any of the months have the same daylight and darkness hours for people who live at the equator, right?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-67059410880512300362008-09-03T16:35:00.000-04:002008-09-03T16:35:00.000-04:00I took a Wonderlic last night via a friend of mine...I took a Wonderlic last night via a friend of mine. 38/50. Two varieties of questions that my brain locked on were:<BR/>Lists of five words where I had to pick three with similar meanings.<BR/>Given the truth of the following statements, is the third one true?<BR/><BR/>The answers for the latter were Yes, No, Uncertain. I had what seemed like an inordinate number of 'Uncertains'.<BR/><BR/>One Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-12787426393013981032008-07-21T23:12:00.000-04:002008-07-21T23:12:00.000-04:007/15 in 3.6 minutes. Ouch!7/15 in 3.6 minutes. Ouch!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-13576633755440649822008-07-21T17:09:00.000-04:002008-07-21T17:09:00.000-04:0011 goes fast if you reduce the numbers to 3,4, and...11 goes fast if you reduce the numbers to 3,4, and 80.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-7956948554191654712008-07-21T15:07:00.000-04:002008-07-21T15:07:00.000-04:00I did not set the clock, and got 15/15 but it took...I did not set the clock, and got 15/15 but it took 6.5 min. Under time pressure, I would have skipped 11 and 13. "I kolb", what was your shortcut for #11?DBhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06742754700763907691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-31416618032827266632008-07-20T22:28:00.000-04:002008-07-20T22:28:00.000-04:0015/15, 5 minutesI barely got #13 - spent about 45 ...15/15, 5 minutes<BR/><BR/>I barely got #13 - spent about 45 seconds doing the math very quickly and didn't have time to double check (luckily I'd made no mistakes). Is there nice shortcut for it like there is for #11?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-79047013585216656872008-07-19T15:04:00.000-04:002008-07-19T15:04:00.000-04:0013/15. Missed an 'easy' one with the names not se...13/15. Missed an 'easy' one with the names not seeing the "ie" inversion. Missed the publishing question due to running out of time.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-28610735027163045122008-07-19T12:54:00.000-04:002008-07-19T12:54:00.000-04:00i got 13 out of 15made a logical mis assumption ab...i got 13 out of 15<BR/><BR/>made a logical mis assumption about introductions in question 14...thinking if it wasnt said it didnt happen<BR/><BR/>i was able to set up the simultaneous equations in 11 ok then repeatedly made math mistakes and ran out of time<BR/><BR/>im not very bright<BR/><BR/>my saving grace is i know it and compensateAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-46199852287773987812008-07-19T10:12:00.000-04:002008-07-19T10:12:00.000-04:00Those were the easy questions. I think.Those were the easy questions. I think.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-5994549337292157212008-07-19T02:09:00.000-04:002008-07-19T02:09:00.000-04:0015/15. Took me about 3 minutes.15/15. Took me about 3 minutes.Dog of Justicehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02066524758114994073noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-24623615630994515692008-07-18T19:12:00.000-04:002008-07-18T19:12:00.000-04:00Wow, that was hard. Giving myself exactly five min...Wow, that was hard. Giving myself exactly five minutes, I missed 5 of 15.Thrashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06536525467048363111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-57601351645959542152008-07-18T17:58:00.000-04:002008-07-18T17:58:00.000-04:00How many points do you get for correctly scaling t...How many points do you get for correctly scaling the sample test score to the Wonderlic? (Hint: You actually have less than five minutes if you want a direct score comparison.)<BR/><BR/>Just eyeballing that position chart, it looks to me like test results correlate with the frequency and ferocity with which a player at that position gets hit. Which way does the causal arrow point there, I wonder?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com