tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post4880770406011924274..comments2024-01-13T18:57:18.243-05:00Comments on Information Processing: That which is notSteve Hsuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02428333897272913660noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-48376544042673154012013-01-03T14:24:45.692-05:002013-01-03T14:24:45.692-05:00Nope, these guys can't prove the fundamental ...Nope, these guys can't prove the fundamental theorem of calculus or truly understand particle physics (neither can I). But I appreciate the sentiment at 40:45. A tad New Agey, sure, but still solid.TheGuyFromEarliernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-55444068345466418432012-12-30T23:25:38.247-05:002012-12-30T23:25:38.247-05:00Here's a vid on a similar subject but which is...Here's a vid on a similar subject but which isn't retarded.<br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5in5EdjhD0gide07noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5880610.post-22682354785868558162012-12-30T10:33:43.792-05:002012-12-30T10:33:43.792-05:00My brothers-in-law and I talk about monism-versus-...My brothers-in-law and I talk about monism-versus-dualism. It may be true, in spiritual sense, that there is only 'I' and that all things are the same, but bound as We are to these bodies, We can not both see the universe as it is and interact in it. They, of course, eat the Hindu stories up and regurgitate them, like they mean something.<br /><br /><br />Happy New Year to you as well.David Coughlinhttp://twitter.com/dscoughlinnoreply@blogger.com