Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
Labels
- physics (342)
- genetics (274)
- finance (259)
- globalization (252)
- brainpower (244)
- technology (199)
- american society (190)
- genomics (180)
- China (171)
- psychometrics (164)
- economics (163)
- photos (156)
- science (156)
- innovation (155)
- psychology (144)
- ai (133)
- travel (130)
- universities (119)
- credit crisis (115)
- higher education (114)
- biology (109)
- human capital (108)
- machine learning (106)
- iq (103)
- startups (98)
- cognitive science (95)
- genetic engineering (94)
- careers (80)
- credit crunch (78)
- autobiographical (76)
- elitism (72)
- statistics (72)
- evolution (71)
- gilded age (71)
- income inequality (69)
- quantum mechanics (65)
- books (61)
- genius (61)
- political correctness (61)
- social science (60)
- caltech (59)
- politics (59)
- talks (58)
- mma (53)
- geopolitics (52)
- history of science (51)
- sci fi (51)
- silicon valley (50)
- academia (49)
- bounded rationality (49)
- kids (49)
- bgi (48)
- education (48)
- podcasts (47)
- mathematics (46)
- cdo (45)
- harvard (45)
- MSU (43)
- derivatives (42)
- realpolitik (40)
- behavioral economics (39)
- intellectual history (38)
- jiujitsu (38)
- history (37)
- literature (37)
- bubbles (36)
- mortgages (36)
- computing (35)
- film (35)
- physical training (35)
- ufc (35)
- bjj (33)
- neuroscience (33)
- expert prediction (32)
- google (32)
- hedge funds (32)
- foo camp (30)
- many worlds (30)
- black holes (29)
- quants (29)
- economic history (28)
- efficient markets (28)
- race relations (28)
- feynman (27)
- movies (27)
- sports (27)
- von Neumann (27)
- affirmative action (26)
- nuclear weapons (26)
- entrepreneurs (25)
- housing (25)
- music (25)
- obama (25)
- security (25)
- singularity (25)
- subprime (25)
- taiwan (24)
- video (24)
- berkeley (22)
- biotech (22)
- ultimate fighting (22)
- athletics (21)
- meritocracy (21)
- wall street (21)
- cds (20)
- conferences (20)
- scifoo (20)
- internet (19)
- quantum field theory (19)
- venture capital (19)
- gender (18)
- goldman sachs (18)
- blogging (17)
- treasury bailout (17)
- university of oregon (17)
- cryptography (16)
- freeman dyson (16)
- new yorker (16)
- smpy (16)
- algorithms (15)
- autism (15)
- cosmology (15)
- japan (15)
- oppenheimer (15)
- personality (15)
- happiness (14)
- height (14)
- chess (13)
- fitness (13)
- hedonic treadmill (13)
- probability (13)
- wwii (13)
- aspergers (12)
- christmas (12)
- india (12)
- les grandes ecoles (12)
- malcolm gladwell (12)
- net worth (12)
- nobel prize (12)
- social networks (12)
- television (12)
- blade runner (11)
- dna (11)
- entropy (11)
- geeks (11)
- neanderthals (11)
- privacy (11)
- string theory (11)
- ability (10)
- football (10)
- government (10)
- italy (10)
- mutants (10)
- nerds (10)
- nsa (10)
- olympics (10)
- pseudoscience (10)
- Einstein (9)
- Go (9)
- complexity (9)
- dating (9)
- encryption (9)
- eugene (9)
- flynn effect (9)
- philosophy of mind (9)
- art (8)
- crossfit (8)
- data mining (8)
- determinism (8)
- harvard society of fellows (8)
- james salter (8)
- keynes (8)
- manhattan (8)
- pca (8)
- philip k. dick (8)
- pop culture (8)
- real estate (8)
- research (8)
- robot genius (8)
- turing test (8)
- usain bolt (8)
- war (8)
- aig (7)
- alan turing (7)
- alpha (7)
- ashkenazim (7)
- basketball (7)
- energy (7)
- france (7)
- free will (7)
- game theory (7)
- games (7)
- hugh everett (7)
- poker (7)
- qcd (7)
- russia (7)
- success (7)
- Fermi problems (6)
- anthropic principle (6)
- bayes (6)
- class (6)
- climate change (6)
- democracy (6)
- environmentalism (6)
- fx (6)
- nassim taleb (6)
- noam chomsky (6)
- patents (6)
- prostitution (6)
- tail risk (6)
- teaching (6)
- volatility (6)
- academia sinica (5)
- bobby fischer (5)
- cold war (5)
- econtalk (5)
- godel (5)
- information theory (5)
- iraq war (5)
- kasparov (5)
- luck (5)
- nonlinearity (5)
- paris (5)
- perimeter institute (5)
- quantum computers (5)
- renaissance technologies (5)
- sad but true (5)
- software development (5)
- vietnam war (5)
- warren buffet (5)
- 100m (4)
- Iran (4)
- Poincare (4)
- bill gates (4)
- borges (4)
- cambridge uk (4)
- charles darwin (4)
- creativity (4)
- drones (4)
- fake alpha (4)
- feminism (4)
- global warming (4)
- hormones (4)
- humor (4)
- inequality (4)
- intellectual property (4)
- judo (4)
- kerviel (4)
- markets (4)
- microsoft (4)
- mixed martial arts (4)
- monsters (4)
- moore's law (4)
- rationality (4)
- solar energy (4)
- soros (4)
- trento (4)
- 200m (3)
- babies (3)
- brain drain (3)
- censorship (3)
- charlie munger (3)
- chet baker (3)
- correlation (3)
- demographics (3)
- ecosystems (3)
- equity risk premium (3)
- facebook (3)
- fannie (3)
- fst (3)
- intellectual ventures (3)
- jim simons (3)
- language (3)
- lee kwan yew (3)
- lewontin fallacy (3)
- lhc (3)
- magic (3)
- michael lewis (3)
- nathan myhrvold (3)
- neal stephenson (3)
- new york times (3)
- olympiads (3)
- path integrals (3)
- risk preference (3)
- search (3)
- sec (3)
- simulation (3)
- sivs (3)
- society generale (3)
- supercomputers (3)
- thailand (3)
- alibaba (2)
- assortative mating (2)
- bear stearns (2)
- bruce springsteen (2)
- charles babbage (2)
- cheng ting hsu (2)
- cloning (2)
- david mamet (2)
- digital books (2)
- donald mackenzie (2)
- eliot spitzer (2)
- empire (2)
- exchange rates (2)
- freddie (2)
- gaussian copula (2)
- heinlein (2)
- industrial revolution (2)
- james watson (2)
- ltcm (2)
- mating (2)
- mba (2)
- mccain (2)
- monkeys (2)
- national character (2)
- nicholas metropolis (2)
- no holds barred (2)
- offices (2)
- oligarchs (2)
- palin (2)
- population structure (2)
- prisoner's dilemma (2)
- skidelsky (2)
- socgen (2)
- sprints (2)
- systemic risk (2)
- twitter (2)
- ussr (2)
- variance (2)
- virtual reality (2)
- abx (1)
- anathem (1)
- andrew lo (1)
- antikythera mechanism (1)
- athens (1)
- atlas shrugged (1)
- ayn rand (1)
- bay area (1)
- beats (1)
- book search (1)
- bunnie huang (1)
- car dealers (1)
- carlos slim (1)
- catastrophe bonds (1)
- cdos (1)
- ces 2008 (1)
- chance (1)
- children (1)
- cochran-harpending (1)
- computers (1)
- cpi (1)
- david x. li (1)
- dick cavett (1)
- dolomites (1)
- drugs (1)
- dune (1)
- eharmony (1)
- epidemics (1)
- escorts (1)
- faces (1)
- fads (1)
- favorite posts (1)
- fiber optic cable (1)
- francis crick (1)
- frauds (1)
- gary brecher (1)
- gizmos (1)
- greece (1)
- greenspan (1)
- hypocrisy (1)
- igon value (1)
- iit (1)
- inflation (1)
- information asymmetry (1)
- iphone (1)
- jack kerouac (1)
- jaynes (1)
- jfk (1)
- john dolan (1)
- john kerry (1)
- john paulson (1)
- john searle (1)
- john tierney (1)
- jonathan littell (1)
- las vegas (1)
- lawyers (1)
- lehman auction (1)
- les bienveillantes (1)
- lowell wood (1)
- lse (1)
- mcgeorge bundy (1)
- mexico (1)
- michael jackson (1)
- mickey rourke (1)
- migration (1)
- mit (1)
- money:tech (1)
- myron scholes (1)
- netwon institute (1)
- networks (1)
- newton institute (1)
- nfl (1)
- oliver stone (1)
- phil gramm (1)
- philanthropy (1)
- philip greenspun (1)
- portfolio theory (1)
- power laws (1)
- pyschology (1)
- randomness (1)
- recession (1)
- sales (1)
- singapore (1)
- skype (1)
- standard deviation (1)
- star wars (1)
- starship troopers (1)
- students today (1)
- teleportation (1)
- tierney lab blog (1)
- tomonaga (1)
- tyler cowen (1)
- venice (1)
- violence (1)
- virtual meetings (1)
- war nerd (1)
- wealth effect (1)
6 comments:
Had to stop listening after the first sentence. How can such a guy be so retarded? Les Etats Unis Merdeux, that's how.
Productivity drives income inequality and rising living standards for the productive. At least 80% of the "employed" in Les Etats Unis Merdeux do not actually do anything. The problem is less in Japan and least in Germany, but is a problem in every developed country.
When all the real work can be done by a small minority of the population the result is NOT rising living standards, it is the exclusion and impoverishment of the unproductive majority.
The liberal economics rule that everyone who can should "work" leads to the absurdity that employees of MacDonald's are counted as employed.
look in the long term, man. Now machines are doing what we were all doing 400 years ago, but our life improved a lot, right?
Eventually right, yes. But the current problem will require the recognition of elite opinion and government policy that 1. everyone must work is passe and that 2. there are significant and inerradicable differences between people, that some are simply better than others and should have more children. This recognition is a long way off.
Steve, without some commentary to explain what point you think this makes it seems a bit self serving. The rise of the rest we should fear? H1B evangelism? If only we would increase spending for university administrators all would be right with the world?
"there are significant and inerradicable differences between people, that
some are simply better than others and should have more children."
I know lots of +2 to +3-ish IQ types. I know none who are so pathology free that I would select any one of them over the others for breeding purposes. How high up the selective breeding do you want to go, and what is the associated breeding load?
Any criteria, however mild or severe, are better than the status quo. The specter of National Socialism is only one impediment. The bigger problem is the neo-liberal ideology. When the biological explanation of class can't hold water the inevitable result is something like Scandinavian socialism or "worse".
Post a Comment